home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Info 1994 March
/
Internet Info CD-ROM (Walnut Creek) (March 1994).iso
/
inet
/
ietf
/
isn
/
isn-minutes-93mar.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-28
|
8KB
|
193 lines
CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
Reported by Art St. George/UNMexico
Minutes of the Internet School Networking Working Group (ISN)
The Internet School Networking Working Group met on April 1, 1993 at
1:30 during the Columbus IETF. The session was chaired by Art St.
George (University of New Mexico) and Connie Stout (Texas Education
Network).
Jennifer Sellers, representing the NASA NREN Group, said that the K-12
networking Frequently Asked Questions document would be made into a
standard before the Amsterdam IETF. She solicited comments for changes.
She said she will post the document to Kidsnet and other mailing lists
for review.
A quick poll revealed that there were no K-12 educators in the room,
with Connie Stout having the most direct involvement. Many in the room
were involved in helping to get K-12 schools on the Internet, either as
consultants, or as part of their jobs as network support people for
universities or regional networks, or as consultants to K-12 schools, or
out of personal interest. The observation was made that people
supporting K-12 networking needed to continue their dialogue with the
K-12 community, since their physical attendance at IETF was inlikely.
Connie observed that some technical staff working for K-12 schools might
attend future IETFs.
There was some discussion of how K-12 schools should pursue funding for
networking. Several observed that in some cases funding can be easy to
come by with the right demonstration of need. Some attendees pointed
out that inter-district funding disparities affect ability to network.
Bill Manning, Rob Raisch, and a couple of other attendees said they
would help devise a list of benefits of networking. Ray Perry of US
West said his organization has prepared a video that shows advantages of
network connectivity.
Connie stated that she has met with twenty-two institutions involved
with K-12 networking initiatives. Someone expressed a need for a list
of all K-12 initiatives under way. Another attendee asked if private
and parochial schools should be part of these initiatives; Connie's
answer was ``yes.''
A distinction was raised between promotional versus ``how to''
documents; there is a need for both.
It was observed that there is a wide range of skill levels among those
interested in starting K-12 networks, and that there is a bootstrap
process required to bring new schools and support staff on-line. There
was some discussion on how to spread the word more broadly. One
suggestion was giving talks at teacher conferences. Brochures from the
Consortium for School Networking were handed out. (Connie Stout is the
Chair; St. George is the Secretary- Treasurer. Their Listserv is
1
COSNDISC@bitnic.bitnet; subscribe via a mail message with ``SUBSCRIBE
COSNDISC First_name Last_name''. General email goes to
cosn@bitnic.bitnet.)
Gene Hastings handed out (!) a document that lists a variety of
connection options for K-12 schools. The document was a menu of options
from dialup to frame relay and all points in between. There was some
concern this document would overwhelm new sites. Consensus was
eventually reached that the document fills a definite need and it should
be refined and enhanced with another, more general document. Gene
mentioned documents available for anonymous ftp from
ftp.cc.berkeley.edu, under /k12.
Connie observed that the average school has two phone lines serving
twenty-two instruments. Connectivity can be a challenge.
John Postel, one of the architects of Internet Domain Name Service,
spoke on the evolution of DNS and the challenges presented by growing
use of the name space. He proposed a model for delegating management of
K-12 names to the states, where state authorities would manage names of
the form:
computer.school.k12.state.us
This announcement led to some lively discussions. Connie observed that
the ``edu'' domain was being used for universities exclusively in that
model, and that K-12 educators felt that, as educators, the name
belonged to them as well. She suggested that universities ought to use
a new ``uni'' domain, and leave ``edu'' for the schools. This led to
some discussion as to how this is handled abroad. In the U.K. it's
``.ac'' for ``academic community.'' A gentleman from Germany told their
practice (which sounded like the word ``school'' is used). Connie
observed that statewide education networks also need to be given .edu
names; e.g., tenet.edu. Bill Manning pointed out that the question of
whether domain names should be geographical or organizational is an old
one. With 10 million Internet nodes on-line now and another 10 million
coming something must be done to manage the namespace in a distributed
fashion.
Bruce Nelson spoke on ISOC/K12 committee issues. He said there is a
need for K-12 focus within the Internet Society -- someone who serves as
spokesperson. He said the Group needs to be sure to include an
international perspective. He does not see the need for an advocacy
group per se, but he does see a need to infuse ISOC with a K-12
perspective.
There was more discussion of the various initiatives for K-12
networking. Art St. George asked if there was a need for a registry of
consultants/advisers who can help new efforts. Discussion was
inconclusive on this point.
2
Attendees
Robert Beer r-beer@onu.edu
John Boatright bryan_boatright@ksc.nasa.gov
Thomas Brisco brisco@pilot.njin.net
Al Broscius broscius@bellcore.com
Sandy Bryant slb@virginia.edu
Susan Calcari calcaris@cerf.net
David Carr Carr@acsu.buffalo.edu
Corinne Carroll ccarroll@bbn.com
Douglas Carson carson@utcc.utoronto.ca
Jodi-Ann Chu jodi@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu
Naomi Courter naomi@concert.net
Brent Curtiss bcurtiss@magnuss.ocs.ohio-state.edu
Mark Davis-Craig mad@merit.edu
Dale Dougherty dale@ora.com
Hans Eriksson hans@sics.se
Sallie Fellows sallie@ed.unh.edu
Dale Finkelson dmf@westie.mid.net
Marcello Frutig frutig@rnp.impa.br
Maria Gallagher maria@nsipo.nasa.gov
Greg Gicale gicale@ohio.gov
Terry Gray gray@cac.washington.edu
Robert Gutierrez gutierre@nsipo.nasa.gov
Martyne Hallgren martyne@nr-tech.cit.cornell.edu
Raymond Harder rharder@eis.calstate.edu
Susan Harris srh@umich.edu
Eugene Hastings hastings@psc.edu
Alisa Hata hata@cac.washington.edu
Ellen Hoffman ellen@merit.edu
Susan Horvath shorvath@merit.edu
Barbara Jennings bjjenni@sandia.gov
John Klensin klensin@infoods.unu.edu
Edward Krol e-krol@uiuc.edu
Hock-Koon Lim lim@po.cwru.edu
Daniel Long long@nic.near.net
Paul Lustgraaf grpjl@iastate.edu
Gary Malkin gmalkin@xylogics.com
Bill Manning bmanning@sesqui.net
Janet L. Marcisak jlm@ftp.com
April Marine april@atlas.arc.nasa.gov
Jerry Martin jerry+@osu.edu
Cynthia Mills cmills@bbn.com
Bruce Nelson bnelson@novell.com
William Owens owens@acsu.buffalo.edu
Brad Parker brad@fcr.com
Marsha Perrott mlp+@andrew.cmu.edu
Roy Perry rperry@advtech.uswest.com
Jon Postel postel@isi.edu
Robert Raisch raisch@ora.com
Joyce K. Reynolds jkrey@isi.edu
Jennifer Sellers sellers@nsipo.nasa.gov
Charlie Smith crsmith@osvi.edu
Robert Ullmann Ariel@Process.com
3
Mario Vecchi mpv@thumper.bellcore.com
Ruediger Volk rv@informatik.uni-dortmund.de
Richard Wiggins wiggins@msu.edu
Liang Wu ltw99@bellcore.com
4